Tag Archives: PSD

October 2020 Update – $OSS.v, $ISDR, $PSD.to, $STC.v, $FTG.to, $PTG.to, $VLN.to

Here is a quick update for the month of October 2020 for some names mentioned on the blog.

  • OneSoft Solutions ($OSS.v)
    • Announced first new customer win in 18 months
    • Pretty big deal given the long wait
    • Still looking for more customer wins in order to move the share price
  • Issuer Direct ($ISDR)
    • Reported Q3 and was really well yoy
    • Share price has doubled since I purchased and is no longer cheap on trailing numbers
    • I still see potential in the business
  • Pulse Seismic ($PSD.to)
    • EdgePoint picked up 3.1 mil shares during a private transaction. They increased their ownership to 24.60%, up from 18%.
    • This is not anywhere near their top 10 in position size, so somewhat of a non-event.
  • Sangoma Technologies Corp ($STC.v)
    • Reported fiscal Q4
      • Good quarter and encouraging outlook
      • Beat previous guidance and issued new 2021 guidance
        • EV/REV
        • EV/EBITDA
  • Firan Technology ($FTG.to)
    • Reported numbers and held a conference call
      • Numbers were better than I would have guessed
        • Managing the covid precautions well
      • Have 3.1 mil in PPP
      • Backlog of 47M of which 26M due in fiscal Q4
        • Likely won’t deliver all though
    • Polar Asset Management picked up some more shares
      • They now own 13% of the outstanding
      • Non-event to me as this isn’t a top 10 holding for them.
  • Pivot Technology Solutions ($PTG.to)
    • Shareholders officially approved the arrangement for $2.60
  • Velan ($VLN.to)
    • Reported numbers and held a conference call
      • Quarter was a little weaker than I anticipated
      • Some additional costs with forex swings, land clean up with sale of plant, continued restructuring,
      • Took over 4 mil in wage subsidy which would have made things worse
    • Good news
      • V20 plan progressing well and seeing some benefit to the business ahead of schedule
      • Backlog is up as book to bill was over 1.2
      • Gross margins are steady
      • Most important to long term – the company now has it’s first independent chairman who has lots of industry experience. This is the Velan family moving to independent leadership. I’m a big fan.

Leave a comment

Filed under Company Updates

July 2020 Update – $OSS.v $ISDR $PSD.to $ISV.to $STC.v

I was thinking that I would try sending out a quick update on the companies mentioned here recently that I keep tabs on. Maybe I’ll make it a regular thing, maybe not. Many companies will be announcing Q2 2020 numbers next week.

OneSoft Solutions – $OSS.v

Their wholly-owned subsidiary (OneBridge Solutions) was named as a finalist of Application Innovation 2020 Microsoft Partner of the Year. The demonstrates the value of their solution and the intimate relationship of the relationship with Microsoft.

Filed a statement of claim against a breach in a Software License Agreement from 2014. The claim is not material from a financial standpoint, but it shows how important they take their IP.

Issuer Direct – $ISDR

Issuer reported their results last night and they were really good. Shares have jumped over 20% today. Revenue was up over 20%. Profitability was the highest in a long time. They have cash to deploy on multiple capital allocation opportunities. If growth and profitability is maintained, then ISDR is still cheap.

Pulse Seismic – $PSD.to

Very rough quarter, but that was expected. Still generated a little bit of cash. They are in compliance with covenants at this point.

Information Services – $ISV.to

They announced an acquisition of Paragon. This diversifies the business and bolts in well to the existing Services side of the business and is recession resistant. The price isn’t dirt cheap, but does seem reasonable.

Sangoma Technologies – $STC.v

Closed a financing for $81 mil. This was oversubscribed. The price was at $2.30 per share. They now have a bunch of cash and I would expect an acquisition announced soon.

 

The author is long shares of $STC.v, $OSS.v and $ISDR

Leave a comment

Filed under Company Updates

Pulse Seismic $PSD.to – opportunity?

Mean reversion can create opportunity. The set up of an established business with experienced management coupled with very low expectations looking ahead can create opportunity. I have had some success with mean reversion in cyclical industries. It can be hard to think that the current out of favor companies will see brighter days ahead (at some point).

Enter Pulse Seismic

It’s been about 3 years ago since I owned Pulse. Here is a quick update from the summer of 2017.

Pulse recently released their Q1 2020. Top line was weak. Who would have thought that record low oil prices coupled with the covid lockdown would have led to the lowest utilization of their data library for as long as I can remember. During Q1 they and to negotiate the covenants on their debt which sent the shares up over 50% initially. Shares are down 50% and 60% ytd and over the last year. At $0.96/share Pulse has a market cap of just over 50mil and an EV of just over 80mil (CAD).

Since then, the company has had a rough couple of years.  Last year they had the opportunity to purchase their largest competitor (Seitel) in the WCSB. The purchase price was very attractive given the cost to shoot new data.

The Deal

See below for a statement on the deal from the 2019 President’s Letter. Highlights are mine. 

For many years Seitel Canada Ltd. provided Canada’s largest library of licensable seismic data, growing aggressively by shooting its own 3D data in active play areas. Pulse had wished to acquire Seitel for quite some time. I would say that the combination of the extended industry downturn and a change in ownership of Seitel’s U.S. parent company last year improved the prospects for a transaction.
Pulse’s overarching desire was to position itself for a longer-term industry recovery, at valuations that would set us up for success in the emerging environment. Bluntly, while others appeared to be giving up on Canada, we were casting a vote of confidence in the producing sector’s long-term future. This was, for us, the optimum set of conditions to bring home the deal.
We did, however, expect the short term to remain difficult, probably as bad as last year and perhaps even worse. So we structured the acquisition financing to have low principal repayments and favourable debt-to-EBITDA covenants. Combined with our absence of debt going in, our strong cash position, low costs, lack of a dividend and continued shareholder free cash flow amidst record low sales, we were confident that we were properly managing
the acquisition’s financial risk.
For $53.6 million cash (plus up to $5 million more based on sales over the next two years), we have acquired 36,354 net square km of 3D seismic data, enlarging our most valuable asset by 126 percent, and 379,207 net km of 2D seismic data, increasing our 2D data by 84 percent. (For further details please see the January 15, 2019 press release or the MD&A for the year ended December 31, 2018.) The 3D data, from which most of the revenue will likely be generated, is complementary, having minimal overlap with Pulse’s 3D data, while the widely spread 2D data is also complementary for the most part, with slightly more overlap than the 3D.
The valuation is very favourable, with the price per square km being approximately one-third the price Pulse paid in its Divestco acquisition in 2010. The Divestco metrics amounted to an estimated 10 percent of the costs of shooting new data. The valuation of the Seitel acquisition, at $1,600 per square km (with zero value assigned to the 2D data), amounts to perhaps 3-5 percent of shooting costs. While the two libraries have been largely depreciated in balance sheet terms, their replacement value is, therefore, in the billions of dollars. We formerly  provided an estimated replacement value for Pulse’s data library, but the figure for the combined library would be so large that it no longer sounds credible. Certainly, replicating Pulse’s data library would take decades of work. And a quick reminder for newcomers to the Pulse story: our seismic library consists of data–pure information — not software. It does not become obsolete, deteriorate or expire, and it can be relicensed and reused an indefinite number of times.

Read that again, the deal was done at 5% of shooting costs. That’s crazy. Having capital at the right time in the cycle can be very lucrative.

Covid and oil prices

If you have been under a rock during lockdown, your internet was cut off and you have made zero effort to pay attention to economy; you would have missed oil trading below zero and making headlines. Thankfully, the same people who seen the trade war, flash crash and the pandemic coming came out during the oil price crash and told everyone what they should have done. Nonetheless, activity in the WCSB is at an all time low. Active rig count is a good proxy for activity in AB and WCSB. Below is a 10 year chart.

Summary

They now have over double the revenue generating opportunity with very low incremental operational costs. This was already a business that generated substantial cash for shareholders over the entire economic cycle, and now it’s pretty much twice the size. The replacement cost of the assets is easily worth more than the market cap of the company and they are still producing cash at this level of activity. Since 2008, their average quarterly EBITDA and CFFO was 7.4mil and 6.9mil or just under $30mil and 28mil annually. They are now twice as big. If they can even get back to that level of activity with twice the data library then they are trading at about 1.4x EV/Average EBITDA and 1.5x EV/Average CFFO. I believe that EBITDA and CFFO are decent metrics for what the business can generate for the owners and feel comfortable using them.

Again, they have almost doubled the size of their data library without materially increasing opex. Management has proven to be make shareholder friendly decisions in the past with dividends, buybacks and debt reduction.

Low risk, high uncertainty for sure.

 

Thanks,

 

Dean

Disclosure: The author is not long shares of $PSD.to at time of writing, but I may initiate at any time.

5 Comments

Filed under Company Analysis